Mueller Recycled – Myth Watch

Mueller didn’t have enough proof to conclude that the president committed and crime including obstruction. Instead of saying so and perform his binary duty he chose to promote a smear campaign agenda and create a road map for covering up his disciples and fired intelligence bosses.

Mueller is repeating the narrative that the “President is Guilty until proven innocent” by saying that “If we had confidence the president did not commit a crime we would have said so.” This is a lie in plain sight because there is no proof of the negative and there is no possibility of proving on any human been that this individual didn’t had an intent of obstructing. Anyway this was a political malicious road-map since is not criminal and there was no underline crime to obstruct for and Mueller could have finish the report in 2017 but his team wanted to fabricate an obstruction trap and narrative without an underline crime.. Mueller team was appointed to search if there are crimes that can be proven . Every person can have crimes but to hold that person accountable the justice system must prove it while Mueller team didn’t have substantial evidence .

Mueller didn’t leave an option for questioning his conduct of an option for tthe investigated to exonerate himself and stepped out of his boundary which is to conclude if there is a crime that can be proved or if there is no such a crime. Mueller also tried to entrap AG Barr by this declaration and the decision that he wanted to release the report in parts as opposed to AG decision to release the report at once.

Mueller didn’t have sufficient proof to conclude there was an obstruction crime. He should have said that: “We didn’t have sufficient proof to conclude that the president commuted a crime” which is wahat he was paid for. Mueller chose to say the negative of the negative in order to affect the 2020 elections and smear the president.

Mueller malicious declaration and intent allegation is a twisted rhetoric that can be used on any human. There is no possibility to have evidence on any human being that he didn’t commit obstruction.

https://youtu.be/xUz5tpSN008

Mueller didn’t fulfill the order to create a copy with sensitive material copy as ordered by AG Barr which led to a 3 weeks delay of the report release after the summary report. This created a malicious trap and road map to blame Barr by Democrats on the Hill for the delay in the release and shattered his intetions to releaes portions that would damage the president.

Mueller conversation with AG Barr and Rosenstein made clear that there was no sufficient legal evidence to show criminality of obstruction and that the reason for not pursuing an obstruction crime conclusion were the facts and not the OLC guideline ( that sitting president is not to prosecuted ). Mueller declaration on the May 29th that the reason for not ruling on obstruction because of the guideline is an admittance that he wasted $35M on something that he wouldn’t be indicting anyway and that he made it for partisan reasons.

“Special Counsel Mueller stated three times to us in that meeting, in response to our questioning, that he emphatically was not saying, but-for the OLC opinion, he would’ve found obstruction,”
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-05-01/attorney-general-william-barr-surprised-robert-mueller-didnt-decide-on-obstruction

Did Mueller lie to Barr?

AG Barr on May 1: "Special counsel Mueller stated three times to us in that meeting that he emphatically was not saying they but for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction."

OLC = Office of Legal Counselhttps://t.co/0nPAokW0UU pic.twitter.com/w8BDeTXFoA
— Ivan Pentchoukov (@IvanPentchoukov) May 29, 2019

Related Links & Sources