Chris Wallace omitted the fact that witnesses and documents allowed to Senate trial in Clinton impeachment were already subpoenaed or scrutinised by Congress or special prosecutor Ken Starr. In Trump impeachment Democrats and Mitt Romney or Collins want to bring witnesses that weren’t called in the hasty “fast and furious” unprecedented weak impeachment.
Rep. Adam Schiff and Chris Wallace are pushing narratives to allow changing precedents for a weak case. The idea of “shooting in 360 degrees” with unimpeachable allegations with no due process or any criminality happened before with Spygate and Kavanaugh hearings. The insinuation of Schiff that GOP cheats more then Democrats doesn’t stand the inuiries and judgements on vote fraud and the thumb on the scale of the media, social media, UK, Ukraine and Russia in favour of Democrats.
The impeachment and the Mueller investigation were politically aimed to change the outcome of 2016 and to interfere in 2020 and to help prosecutors and investigators stonewall any investigation on the Bidens or other friend and family of Americans and oligarchs who got jobs, contracts or favouritism that has to do with international aid or financing.
The idea of the impeachment is to shake the trees and to see what falls because the articles are vague and have weak or no evidence at all. Meanwhile out of context information is pushed by the media in an orchestrated manner. This is done to deflect the public from watching Senate hearings and pushing an agenda that covers up Democrat collusion with Ukraine, Russia, UK and the media that affected 2016 and 2018 elections as well as trying to change the outcome of 2020 elections with the impeachment and out of context leaks from NCS and Intelligence Community.
Some say Chris Wallace pulled a similar stunt with a suspicious timing that had interfered or harmed Kavanaugh hearings in the Senate. On the other the timing and writing a smear book is a method that publishers out in collusion with former public service officials as did happen with Comey and McCabe that didn’t get investigated or indicted for leaking sensitive or half truth and out of context stories. This is done usually in orchestration of media outlets taht want to replace the president using all means.
Resources and Related Links
Katie Pavlich Arguing on Chriss Wallace Narrative
https://pbs.twimg.com/ext_tw_video_thumb/1221868896900341761/pu/img/-cp0kZYgFc5ojLdv?format=jpg&name=small
Fred Fleitz on Bolton Book
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ambassador-bolton-withdraw-your-book-fred-fleitz
NYT allegation of Bolton leak Official Rebuke
https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1221854303993913355
Rand Paul on Bolton Book
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/rand-paul-disgruntled-angry-bolton-using-leak-to-make-a-lot-more-money
Mitt Romney Double Standards on calling Bolton
https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/27/after-urging-bolton-testimony-romney-refuses-to-say-if-he-supports-calling-biden-schiff-whistleblower-as-witnesses/
Chris Wallace insinuation that Bolton publishers or Vindman brother are more reliable then Mulvaney and Pence
https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-john-bolton-claim-trump-spinning
The Bolton Witness Wannabe Stunt
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/impeachment-defense-day-2-the-bolton-brouhaha