Why did Michigan and other states picked a Canadian company that has ties with the Clintons over an American company to run election software?
The decision to select a Canadian company to run election systems in many counties enables the contractor and contracted evade or slowdown any investigation of the American law enforcement as well as access of observers. It is almost impossible to arrest or interrogate in a timely manner Canadian workers and their management by American authorities the same way as what happened with Christopher Steele, his company and his accomplices from overseas. It is easier to use a foreign company to plan or cover up improprieties.
If we recall the Steele Dossier sting, we might understand why Michigan and other states used “Dominion” as software of choice for the election. In the Steel dossier case Democrats and Hillary Clinton campaign used British sources to frame their GOP opponent, knowing that it is a slow or impossible process to subpoena or arrest English people when time is of the essence.
At the end of the day the 2018 election was polluted by Mueller investigation that was generated by HRC campaign plot using English, Australian, Russian and Ukrainian nationals in order to launder a political hit campaign. The investigation was extended on purpose by Mueller team that suppressed the fact that the Russian Collusion was a Democrat stunt which served as vilifying the president and as a smoke screen on Biden, Kerry, Clinton and Obama actions. Mueller had a feud with the president before being appointed and his team members were bureaucrats that supported the Democrat party agenda while donating to that party.
Every software system has its backdoor needed for maintenance, statistics, manual curation and quality control. Since “Dominion” managers are anti-Trump and have connection to the Democrat party and Clinton entities it is likely that programmers from the company gave access to election official to the backdoors or performed changes on their behalf. This is why is was very important to get the complicity of the plot of Desk HQ and media to strop the bleeding” so “errors” could be inserted when flippable gaps are seen. This explains why 6000 votes where flipped from Trump in an “Error” and it may imply many other “errors” have been committed elsewhere. There is no way that error was introduced manually without Software people explaining to polling managers how to intervene manually. If the manual intervention exists in one precinct in one county it can happen everywhere.
