Whistle Blower Impeachment Testimony

A new motive surfaces for the whistle blower narrative and impeachment.

Kent, Voguel & Yovanovitch called by Democrats in Congress can be called by Republicans in Senate to testify without any reasonable opposition. On a new emerging redacted letter to the 2016 Obama’s State Department, there is evidence that the whistle blower entourage knew or participated in Hunter Biden-Burisma involvement or cover up. State department officials raised concerns about “complications” that would arise from Hunter Biden involvement with Burisma and other persons of interest that were about to be investigated. The letter sent by Voguel reached George Kent and other state department officials who had formulated a mechanism to deal and have a “damage control” on the issue. The principles and response guidelines on the Biden issue were conveyed to Yovanovitch and her team while being at the Ukraine embassy.

Investigations on the Bidens and Burisma were stonewalled by bureaucrats politicians both in the Ukraine, the Embassy and the United States ever since 2016 impeding documents and pressuring prosecutors to turn a blind eye on the issue. The senate role is to discover if the whistle blower and Atkinson (the ICIG) were turning a blind eye or were involved in helping the Bidens or Schiff for political or Quid-pro-quo reasons while receiving salaries paid with taxpayers money and using government information systems.

Some reports suggest this is one of the reasons Obama didn’t endorse or support Biden presidential run to begin with. There was a calculation that Biden involvement might expose the transactions made between Americans and Ukrainian Oligarchs and politicians’ families and friends. Some claim that this would expose kickbacks done on Ukrainian aid which is estimated as much as over then $ 7 Billions in the form of contracts, jobs or other favouritism.

The common denominator on Spygate and Ukrainegate is an endeavour to smear the president with an agenda that supposedly would deflect prosecutors and media investigations on Bidens entourage. Favouritism and election interference through funding opposition research, dossiers fabrication or smear campaigns were done using business people, politicians and journalists that supported the Democrat party or donated in 2012 and 2016 elections.

https://twitter.com/winningatmylife/status/1220201045885902848…

The 17 witnesses brought so far can’t suffice and evidence that rises to any level of impeachable crime. Moreover, many “star-chamber” testimonies contradict the impeachment articles. The use of the articles shows that the allegations on quid-pro-quo, treason or bribery were baseless to begin with and therefore they switched the articles to expeditionary vague terms on the fly.

In order to assure fair trial Republicans can ask 17 new witnesses to testify and counter the witnesses brought by congress. The first 17 witnesses brought to the congress which Democrats can be called by managers again or by the white house team as witnesses, They are good defence witnesses because they contradict each other and debunk the articles.

The timeline of events suggests the Ukrainian government was reopening investigation against Biden and Burisma long before the whistle blower reported phone call which totally undermines the allegation that there was an impeachable offence on abuse of power or quid pro quo.

Yovanonvitch still has to follow up her testimony and let the American people know:

How the state department coached bureaucrats to cover up the Biden scandal and other scandals in China, Iran, Chalupa’s Ukraine, Russia and Steele’s UK.
What was the “do not prosecute list”
The involvement on Paul Pelosi in Ukraine dealings
Who created and executed the blacklist on journalists
What was her role with Kerry, HRC and the Whistle blower entourage.

A new motive surfaces for the whistle blower narrative and impeachment.

Related Links and Sources