Ken Starr Vs. Weissmann
Kenneth Starr special counsel found 11 accounts for proven crimes which led to impeachment proceedings including underlined crimes on president Clinton.
Weissmann, McCabe and Mueller tried to fabricate at least 11 accounts of obstruction but couldn’t prove any of them using $40,000,000 of tax payers money while dividing the American people. They even couldn’t prove any obstruction crime on any other member in the inner circle, which makes Mueller, Nadler, Pelosi and Schiiff allegations about OLC guidance false .
The DNC apparatus with the help of intelligence community tried to fabricate a crime of collusion with Russia on the president inner circle in order to remove him, harass the executive and affect the 2018 and 2020 elections but . This was done using Russian assets but Mueller team maliciously covered it up, although the appointment letter specifically stated that all related matters should be investigated.
As far as the GOP campaign they couldn’t establish any crime of conspiracy with Russians but they covered up collusion of the DNC with Russia and Ukraine which makes this probe a political baseless biased persecution.
If another special counsel had the same amount of resources, lawyers and entrapment methods, they would be able to state that they can’t exonerate Nadler, Cummings, Pelosi or Schiff on obstruction or other crimes, the same way Mueller did.
It wouldn’t even pass the supreme court, but meanwhile Pelosi and colleagues are using Mueller harassment attempt as part as their 2020 campaign.
Mueller Recycled
Mueller didn’t have enough proof to conclude that the president committed and crime including obstruction. Instead of saying so and perform his binary duty he chose to promote a smear campaign agenda and create a road map for covering up his disciples and fired intelligence bosses.
Mueller is repeating the narrative that the “President is Guilty until proven innocent” by saying that “If we had confidence the president did not commit a crime we would have said so.” This is a lie in plain sight because there is no proof of the negative and there is no possibility of proving on any human been that this individual didn’t had an intent of obstructing. Anyway this was a political malicious road-map since is not criminal and there was no underline crime to obstruct for and Mueller could have finish the report in 2017 but his team wanted to fabricate an obstruction trap and narrative without an underline crime.. Mueller team was appointed to search if there are crimes that can be proven . Every person can have crimes but to hold that person accountable the justice system must prove it while Mueller team didn’t have substantial evidence .
Mueller didn’t leave an option for questioning his conduct of an option for tthe investigated to exonerate himself and stepped out of his boundary which is to conclude if there is a crime that can be proved or if there is no such a crime. Mueller also tried to entrap AG Barr by this declaration and the decision that he wanted to release the report in parts as opposed to AG decision to release the report at once.
Mueller didn’t have sufficient proof to conclude there was an obstruction crime. He should have said that: “We didn’t have sufficient proof to conclude that the president commuted a crime” which is wahat he was paid for. Mueller chose to say the negative of the negative in order to affect the 2020 elections and smear the president.
Mueller malicious declaration and intent allegation is a twisted rhetoric that can be used on any human. There is no possibility to have evidence on any human being that he didn’t commit obstruction.
https://youtu.be/xUz5tpSN008
Mueller didn’t fulfill the order to create a copy with sensitive material copy as ordered by AG Barr which led to a 3 weeks delay of the report release after the summary report. This created a malicious trap and road map to blame Barr by Democrats on the Hill for the delay in the release and shattered his intetions to releaes portions that would damage the president.
Mueller conversation with AG Barr and Rosenstein made clear that there was no sufficient legal evidence to show criminality of obstruction and that the reason for not pursuing an obstruction crime conclusion were the facts and not the OLC guideline ( that sitting president is not to prosecuted ). Mueller declaration on the May 29th that the reason for not ruling on obstruction because of the guideline is an admittance that he wasted $35M on something that he wouldn’t be indicting anyway and that he made it for partisan reasons.
“Special Counsel Mueller stated three times to us in that meeting, in response to our questioning, that he emphatically was not saying, but-for the OLC opinion, he would’ve found obstruction,”
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-05-01/attorney-general-william-barr-surprised-robert-mueller-didnt-decide-on-obstruction
Related Links & Sources
https://www.c-span.org/video/?459922-1/william-barr-testifies-mueller-report-senate-judiciary-committee&start=2058#
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
Other Mueller Tricks
https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/05/mueller-fbi-wrongful-conviction-case/
Mueller Protection of the Clinton Foundations in 2005
https://www.infowars.com/in-2005-mueller-closed-grand-jury-probe-into-clintons-pardon-of-marc-rich/
Orchestration of Russiagate
Accordingly to new declassified information and timing analysis more evidence is affirming that the Russia-gate political persecutions was disseminated in the same time purposely through various outlets and bureaucrats. Communication between of Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Steele, Lawmaker Reid, Lawmaker Schiff, Lawmaker Warner, David Corn, Perkins Coie individuals, state department officials and other intelligence community members were part of the political attempt to smear, set up or persecute the president, his family and his business.
The attempt was done with illegal leaking and defamation campaigns made by the mainstream media. When their think tank came to a conclusion that the Russian collusion investigation might uncover their plot they orchestrated with the media and Mueller team a new smear agenda that tried tro frame the president into an obstruction trap.
Bruce Ohr Conflict of Interest
Bruce Ohr was warned that Nelly Ohr work has conflicts of interest by Lisa Holtyn. Lisa Holtyn was personal friend with the Ohrs, and exchanged many emails about the Russian Hoax and was part of the cover-up of operation Fast and Furious. In an email Lisa Holtyn asks if Nelly Ohr can provide information to Ivana Nizich and Her husband Joe Wheatley on a new research.
One of the reasons Ohr and others didn’t care about the conflict of interest in March 2916, probably was the premise that HRC would win the elections.
://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/JW-v-DOJ-Ohr-Steele-Fusion-GPS-00490.pdf
Related Links and Sources
Nellie and Bruce Ohr part in the Introduction of the Russian set up
https://dcdocumentreports.com/our-analysis-of-ohrs-testimony/
Arabic
English
French
Hebrew
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish